The Law Offices of Palumbo & Renaud
Phone: 908-316-8671

Do you have the right to any privacy over your phone metadata?

With the revelations about just how broad and deep government surveillance appears to be in the United States, you may wonder if the right to privacy has simply disappeared. Well, it hasn't disappeared in New Jersey -- at least, not yet.

As you may already know, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, so no inferior law -- including a state constitution -- can violate civil rights guaranteed by it. The reverse, however, isn't true. State constitutions can offer greater civil rights protections than those provided by the federal constitution. 

A case currently before the New Jersey Supreme Court may demonstrate that point. A criminal defendant is hoping to rein in government surveillance by appealing to his privacy rights under the New Jersey Constitution. That way, no matter what the U.S. Supreme Court may or may not say on the matter under the federal constitution, our citizens' privacy rights would still be protected.

Does New Jersey's constitution protect the privacy of cellphone metadata?

The case came up as part of a Monmouth County grand jury investigation of whether a certain Asbury Park man was distributing cocaine. Grand juries have subpoena power, meaning they can order third parties to provide any information that isn't privileged (e.g. attorney-client privilege) or otherwise legally considered private.

During this investigation, the grand jury issued a subpoena against Verizon seeking the man's cellphone billing and call records. These records include detailed information about who called him and whom he called; for how long and at what time; even exactly where he was when the calls were made. Even without knowing what was said, prosecutors would easily be able to paint a pretty detailed picture of his private life. He appealed to the superior court.

Should prosecutors be allowed to get detailed personal information just by asking for it by subpoena? Absolutely not, the appellate court ruled. New Jersey's constitution does protect the privacy of this information, so a warrant -- not just a subpoena -- is required before the government can get its hands on such data.

The Attorney General's Office apparently hopes this case can be used to overrule previous ones requiring warrants. After all, asking a judge before you dig into the details of someone's life is such a bother.

On the other hand, New Jersey has a long history of protecting our civil liberties -- including requiring warrants.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn How I Can Help You

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Cranford Office
190 North Avenue East Suite 1
Cranford, NJ 07016

Toll Free: 866-664-8118
Phone: 908-316-8671
Cranford Law Office Map

Elizabeth Office
740 Newark Avenue
Elizabeth, NJ 07208

Toll Free: 866-664-8118
Phone: 908-316-8671
Elizabeth Law Office Map

Brielle Office
503 Union Avenue
Brielle, NJ 08730

Toll Free: 866-664-8118
Phone: 908-316-8671
Map & Directions

Phone: 908-316-8671 Fax: 908-272-9029
Do you have the right to any privacy over your phone metadata? | The Law Offices of Palumbo & Renaud